34 ms·

I'd rename it to Tuk-Tuk Boom, because from the looks of the (non-recoilless) cannon it could obviously only go "boom" once, after which the flimsy vehicle woul

by rob74 3y ago

I'd rename it to Tuk-Tuk Boom, because from the looks of the (non-recoilless) cannon it could obviously only go "boom" once, after which the flimsy vehicle would be utterly destroyed...

stavros 3y ago
But then does a tuk-tuk go "tuk" twice?