I think he is merely pointing out that you can’t just say “someone is doing something that harms me as a result of my speech” and call that censorship. Otherwis

I think he is merely pointing out that you can’t just say “someone is doing something that harms me as a result of my speech” and call that censorship. Otherwise literally no one could ever make any decision based on someone’s speech, which is insane. The reason he is asking for precision is because ultimately it is helpful to actually engage with the question of how do we allow debate without turning things into a mess, and that likely requires making some normative statement about what should and should not be ok to do in response to speech.