4 ms·
It seems extremely short sighted for the rest of the board to go along with that.
by insanitybit 3y ago
It seems extremely short sighted for the rest of the board to go along with that.
- adastra22 3y agoWell obviously that wouldn't be the explanation given to other board members. But it would be the reason he instigated this after dev day, and the reason he won't back down (OpenAI imploding? All the better).
- shandor 3y agoBut it’s still surprising the other three then haven’t sacked D’Angelo, then. You’d think with the shitstorm raging and the underlying reasoning seemingly so…inadequate, they would start seeing that D’Angelo was just playing them.
- singularity2001 3y agomaybe they have their own 'good' reasons to sabotage openAI
- rtpg 3y agoBut you would need to convince the rest of the board with _something_, right? Like to not only fire this guy, but to do it very publicly, quickly, with the declaration of lying in the announcement. There are 3 other people on the board, right? Maybe they're all buddies of some big masterminding, but I dunno..
- adastra22 3y agoThe one thing they all have in common is being AI safetyists, which Sam is not. I’d bet it’s something to do with that.
- sangnoir 3y agoHN has been radiating a lot of "We did it Reddit!" energy these past 4 days. Lots of confident conjecture based on very little. I have been guilty of it myself, but as an exercise in humility, I will come back to these threads in 6 months to see how wrong I and many others were.
- gardenhedge 3y agoThat might make an interesting blog post. If you write anything up, you should submit it!
- kmlevitt 3y agoI agree it's all just speculation. But the board aren't doing themselves any favors by not talking. As long as there is no specific reason for firing him given, it's only natural people are going to fill the void with their own theories. They have a problem with that, they or their attorneys need to speak up.