3 ms·
The point is to discourage others from doing the same. It's a classic SLAPP lawsuit. Some federal circuits (e.g. the 9th) have protections against SLAPP lawsui
by muglug 3y ago
The point is to discourage others from doing the same. It's a classic SLAPP lawsuit.
Some federal circuits (e.g. the 9th) have protections against SLAPP lawsuits. The 5th circuit (where this lawsuit was filed) does not, and the district judge is Reed O'Connor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_O%27Connor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_O%27Connor) who's infamous for rulings friendly to conservative causes.
- kasdi 3y agoIsn’t this is a jury trial?
- aw1621107 3y agoIf it gets to that point, yes. There are multiple places where the lawsuit can end before a jury enters the picture (dismissal and summary judgement being more prominent examples), and in those cases it's the judge making the ruling. The insinuation here is that the venue was chosen to get a judge that is less likely to rule against X/Twitter in those earlier stages and make it more likely that later stages of the trial will be reached.