4 ms·
You need actual malicious intent - what protects media matters is the same thing that protects most crazed AM broadcasters right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
by bigmattystyles 3y ago
You need actual malicious intent - what protects media matters is the same thing that protects most crazed AM broadcasters right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
- dragontamer 3y agoIIRC, "Reckless" is enough for some cases of slander. I don't see how this passes the bar of "Reckless" however.
- rsynnott 3y agoAlso, of course, if what was said is _true_, then intent becomes irrelevant.