3 ms·

> Might I introduce you to the Tupolev Tu-134? Also perhaps the 737-MAX. :) * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maneuvering_Characteristics_Augmentation_System ht

• verdverm 3y ago
  Given how much the max family and 8 are flown, I don't think this holds up. Some searching says... 1. >1000 flights per day for the family 2. 2 US carriers accounting for more than 200 Max 8 per day So one would have to get to 20,000 flights after two crashes to get 2 nines. We're well past that threshold
  • Xixi 3y ago
    From inception to the second crash, numbers were abysmal. The 737 Max was crashing at a rate of about one per hundred thousand flights, two order of magnitude worse that the 737 NG (one fatal crash per 10 million flights). Said differently, the Max 8 was working safely 99.999% of the time, while the 737 NG was working safely 99.99999% of the time. An order of magnitude better than 99.99%, but two orders of magnitude worse than expected... It is certainly a lot safer now. Hopefully even better than the 737 NG.
  • throwaway318 3y ago
    The probability of not having a crash after 20,000 flights, with 99.99% chance per flight, assuming no serial correlation, is 13%.
    • verdverm 3y ago
      Yes, there is a better, more accurate method than my napkin math, which was only to provide a baseline most could understand to see we are well beyond the two nines
  • deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]