3 ms·
Matt Levine has a useful diagram on this: https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/ixMQ90DVObmo/v0/-1x-1.png https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHB
by stefan_ 3y ago
Matt Levine has a useful diagram on this:
https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/ixMQ90DVObmo/v0/-1x-1.png https://assets.bwbx.io/images/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/ixMQ90DVObm...
- genman 3y agoAnd? They don't own the non profit part of Open AI, they have not invested anything into it. Why he thinks that he has authority to dictate how the non profit should be structured? I don't think he has.
- TaylorAlexander 3y agoHe doesn't "have the authority to dictate" but he does "have an extremely influential position and his opinion is potentially very important to the non profit".
- rrdharan 3y agoThe Levine newsletter explains this very explicitly. They have no authority on paper. They have plenty of authority in practice by virtue of exercising their power/leverage inherent in OpenAI’s dependence on them for compute resources.
- summerlight 3y agoThe non-profit part won't ever work without Microsoft's finance/infrastructure. Satya might not have nominal power on the board, but he definitely has a power to make OpenAI miserable and proved it over the weekend.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]