Right, this was sort of the point I made in another comment here. I know that a solid safety net will result in some freeloading. But when I trade off the nega

Right, this was sort of the point I made in another comment here. I know that a solid safety net will result in some freeloading. But when I trade off the negatives of the limited freeloading that I believe will occur against the massive benefits of a population that is healthy, fed, housed, secure ... there's just no contest. If I have to pay a tiny bit extra because a few people are scamming the system, I frankly don't care, and I certainly don't advocate for the destruction of the entire system because of it.