Q: Is this a valid argument? "The structure that allows the LLM to realistically 'mimic' human communication is its intelligence. https://g.co/bard/share/a8c67

Q: Is this a valid argument? "The structure that allows the LLM to realistically 'mimic' human communication is its intelligence. https://g.co/bard/share/a8c674cfa5f4 https://g.co/bard/share/a8c674cfa5f4 : > [...] > Premise 1: LLMs can realistically "mimic" human communication. > Premise 2: LLMs are trained on massive amounts of text data. > Conclusion: The structure that allows LLMs to realistically "mimic" human communication is its intelligence. "If P then Q" is the Material conditional: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_conditional Does it do logical reasoning or inference before presenting text to the user? That's a lot of waste heat. (Edit) with next word prediction just is it, "LLMs cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38353285 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38353285 "Misalignment and Deception by an autonomous stock trading LLM agent" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38353880#38354486 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38353880#38354486