4 ms·
That's not the same interface that I was referring to. I was talking about this: http://i.imgur.com/8lzif.png http://i.imgur.com/8lzif.png
by mistercow 15y ago
That's not the same interface that I was referring to. I was talking about this: http://i.imgur.com/8lzif.png http://i.imgur.com/8lzif.png
- notatoad 15y agoit's not the same appearance, but it's the same functionality.
- mistercow 15y agoNo it's not, because if the Flash object is invisible, it simply does not give you any way to enable them unless you go to the preferences and explicitly add an exception. This was my entire point in the first place, if you look up at the beginning of the thread. For example, turn on click-to-play and then go to pandora.com. If Chrome treated Flash the same as Java, you would still be able to use pandora easily.