4 ms·
Punishing people who were never victimizers and promoting people who were never victims for the sake of equity doesn't address the problems of a single parent h
by pauldenton 3y ago
Punishing people who were never victimizers and promoting people who were never victims for the sake of equity doesn't address the problems of a single parent household and the consequences it has for children, but that is proposed for the sake of Equity all the time
- lapcat 3y agoGreater equality is not a "punishment". It's simply a necessity for a functional, just, compassionate society. In any case, we are all beneficiaries or victims of the past. Children don't start from equal positions. "average per capita wealth of White Americans was $338,093 in 2019 but only $60,126 for Black Americans" https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2022/how-the-racial-wealth-gap-has-evolved-and-why-it-persists https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2022/how-the-racial-w... As stated by the linked article, this is actually a vast improvement from 150 years ago. But let's not pretend that the existence of the racial gap wasn't the result of historical factors. Arguing that we're all equal now would just be sticking one's head in the sand and pretending that history didn't exist.
- pauldenton 3y ago[dead]
- lern_too_spel 3y ago"Punishing people" is an immature way of looking at public policy. When the government uses my tax money to pay for prisons, is that punishing me? The point is that the policy is meant for the public benefit, and we can debate the merits of each policy on their outcomes. What addresses the problems of a single parent household then? Let's hear your solutions.
- pauldenton 3y ago[dead]