5 ms·
Because the mission is visibly abandoned. There's nothing "open" about OpenAI. We may not know how the mission was abandoned but we know Sam was CEO, hence resp
by iteratethis 3y ago
Because the mission is visibly abandoned. There's nothing "open" about OpenAI. We may not know how the mission was abandoned but we know Sam was CEO, hence responsible.
- Wytwwww 3y agoWhat as "open" about it before that?
- iteratethis 3y agoThe first word in their company name.
- thrwmoz 3y agoThere was never anything open about open ai. If there were I should have access to their training data, training infra setup and weights. The only thing that changed is the reason why the unwashed masses aren't allowed to see the secret sauce: from alignment to profit. A plague on both their houses.
- marricks 3y agoThey don't publish papers now, they actually published papers and code before. No doubt OpenAI was never a glass house... but it seems extremely disingenuous to say their behavior hasn't changed.
- wvenable 3y agoWhat was "open" before ChatGPT?
- Zambyte 3y agohttps://github.com/openai/gpt-2 https://github.com/openai/gpt-2
- nikcub 3y agoIn terms of the LLM's, it was abandoned after GPT-2 when they realised the dangers of what was coming with GPT 3/3.5. Better to paywall access to and monitor it than open-source it and let it loose on the world. ie. the original mission was never viable long-term.
- gsuuon 3y agoIsn't Ilya even more against opening up models? OpenAI is more open in one way - it's easier to get API access (compared to say Anthropic)