3 ms·
We already have driving tests, have them pass those, and if those tests aren't stringent enough then the tests need fixing, for humans and robots alike.
by avar 3y ago
We already have driving tests, have them pass those, and if those tests aren't stringent enough then the tests need fixing, for humans and robots alike.
- thfuran 3y agoI'm not convinced that the tests should be the same. A human and a computer aren't the same thing, so why must they be assessed the same way?
- Teever 3y agoBecause it's not about the thing that's doing, it's about the thing that's being done.
- thfuran 3y agoBut it is about the thing that's doing. A test is designed with assumptions and knowledge about the thing under test. That two systems perform the same on a test doesn't necessarily mean that they will perform the same out of band, so unless the test is exactingly and comprehensively covering the totality of desired behavior/functionality, two fundamentally very different systems may best be tested with two different tests.
- gwbas1c 3y agoThe driving tests in the US are a joke, IMO.