3 ms·
> we could probably get rid of >50% of all cars on the road I've seen this argument before but it doesn't make sense to me. In some subset of situations, yes,
by webdood90 3y ago
> we could probably get rid of >50% of all cars on the road
I've seen this argument before but it doesn't make sense to me. In some subset of situations, yes, this would be the case. But 8-9a or 5-6p there is a surge of demand in every major metro in America.
Developing self driving cars is not a fruitful endeavor IMO. We need to push alternative modes of transportation (transit, e-bikes, etc) which are way, way more efficient and cost effective.
- dventimi 3y agoWhat do you mean "we"? Push for alternative modes of transportation to the complete exclusion of autonomous vehicles if you like. Personally, I like autonomous vehicle and will continue to advocate for them.
- mullingitover 3y ago> Developing self driving cars is not a fruitful endeavor IMO. We need to push alternative modes of transportation (transit, e-bikes, etc) which are way, way more efficient and cost effective. The US is incapable of building cost-effective heavy transit though. Just building a few miles of subway in the LA metro area, for example, costs on the order of double digit billions and takes a decade plus. In huge areas of the country where it's snowy in the winter, e-bikes are a non-starter. I'm not saying every self-driving vehicle needs to be a single occupancy car. We could have fleets of self-driving minivans that are somewhere between buses and cars that can move the dramatically more people than solo drivers. Even self-driving buses would be a win, a very big chunk of the operating expenses of public bus fleets is the payroll for drivers.
- webdood90 3y ago> a few miles of subway in the LA metro area, for example, costs on the order of double digit billions and takes a decade plus Then don't build trains - busses work fine. > In huge areas of the country where it's snowy in the winter, e-bikes are a non-starter I live in Denver - it's fine. I don't hear feasibility concerns in your arguments - I hear convenience concerns. How I interpret this is that you, and many other people in the world, prioritize convenience above all else. I understand why, but we must come to the realization that we're taking the side of convenience over everything else: decrease in safety, increased electrical consumption, increased congestion, increased pollution, increased noise, etc.