3 ms·
> The OpenAI board, which has no legal obligation to shareholders or really to anything besides AI safety It’s really interesting to see this said as if it’s s
by ricardobeat 3y ago
> The OpenAI board, which has no legal obligation to shareholders or really to anything besides AI safety
It’s really interesting to see this said as if it’s something terrible. That’s the entire reason this company exists.
- dnissley 3y agoIt's not being said as if it's terrible, it's shining a light on the fact that OpenAI without a cutting edge product to attempt to practice AI safety on is something much tinier, much different, and altogether less important. Without that it becomes a sort of activist non-profit like the pause people, attempting to garner support or influence policy for a cause it doesn't have a direct stake in.
- ricardobeat 3y agoThat’s not the case as long as they hold the state-of-the-art in the field. Which they do.
- dnissley 3y agoHow do you propose they recoup the massive expenses of holding state-of-the-art in the field?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]