And yet this point from the article seems to be something that the author (not Altman) was surprised by: > Sam Altman says he wants to develop AI for the benef

And yet this point from the article seems to be something that the author (not Altman) was surprised by: > Sam Altman says he wants to develop AI for the benefit of humanity yet at the first possible moment he sets up a deal that sells 49% of their endeavor to Microsoft. Maybe Altman thought Microsoft would be the best way to fund the venture, while still benefiting humanity. It's not as if selling 49% to Microsoft will guarantee the venture won't succeed. Altman isn't omniscient; he's making his best possible moves based on his prediction of future, as we all do.