6 ms·

They could make ChatGPT++ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_J%2B%2B https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_J%2B%2B

by alasdair_ 3y ago

dangrover 3y ago
ChatGPT#
- hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
  Hopefully ChatGPT will make it easier to search/differentiate between ChatGPT, ChatGPT++, and ChatGPT# than Google does.
  - albert_e 3y ago
    dotGPT
- patapong 3y ago
  ChatGPT Series 4
- eli_gottlieb 3y ago
  Visual ChatGPT#.net
- TeMPOraL 3y ago
  Also Managed ChatGPT, ChatGPT/CLR.
- gfosco 3y ago
  WSG, Windows Subsystem for GPT
  - cyanydeez 3y ago
    ClippyAI
- klft 3y ago
  ChatGPT NT
- fluidcruft 3y ago
  ClipGPT
- adrianmonk 3y ago
  Dot Neural Net
prepend 3y ago
“Microsoft Chat 365” Although it would be beautiful if they name it Clippy and finally make Clippy into the all-powerful AGI it was destined to be.
- kylebenzle 3y ago
  At least in this forum can we please stop calling something that is not even close to AGI, AGI. Its just dumb at this point. We are LIGHT-YEARS away from AGI, even calling an LLM "AI" only makes sense for a lay audience. For developers and anyone in the know LLMs are called machine learning.
  - prepend 3y ago
    I’m taking about the ultimate end product that Microsoft and OpenAI want to create. So I mean proper AGI. Naming the product Clippy now is perfectly fine while it’s just an LLM and will be more excellent over the years when it eventually achieves AGI ness. At least in this forum can we please stop misinterpreting things in a limited way to make pedantic points about how LLMs aren’t AGI (which I assume 98% of people here know). So I think it’s funny you assume I think chatgpt is an AGI.
    - JohnFen 3y ago
      I think that the dispute is about whether or not AGI is possible (at least withing the next several decades). One camp seems to be operating with the assumption that not only is it possible, but it's imminent. The other camp is saying that they've seen little reason to think that it is. (I'm in the latter camp).
      - prepend 3y ago
        I certainly think it’s possible but have no idea how close. Maybe it’s 50 years, maybe it’s next year. Either way, I think GGP’s comment was not applicable based on my comment as written and certainly my intent.
      - 3y ago
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
trhway 3y ago
>They could make ChatGPT++ Yes, though end result would probably be more like IE - barely good enough, forcefully pushed into everything and everywhere and squashing better competitors like IE squashed Netscape. When OpenAI went in with MSFT it was like they have ignored the 40 years of history of what MSFT has been doing to smaller technology partners. What happened to OpenAI pretty much fits that pattern of a smaller company who developed great tech and was raided by MSFT for that tech (the specific actions of specific persons aren't really important - the main factor is MSFT's gravitational force of a black hole, and it was just a matter of time before its destructive power manifests itself like in this case where it just tore apart the OpenAI with tidal forces)

They could make ChatGPT++ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_J%2B%2B https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_J%2B%2B

dangrover 3y ago

ChatGPT#

hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
Hopefully ChatGPT will make it easier to search/differentiate between ChatGPT, ChatGPT++, and ChatGPT# than Google does.
- albert_e 3y ago
  dotGPT
patapong 3y ago
ChatGPT Series 4
eli_gottlieb 3y ago
Visual ChatGPT#.net
TeMPOraL 3y ago
Also Managed ChatGPT, ChatGPT/CLR.
gfosco 3y ago
WSG, Windows Subsystem for GPT
- cyanydeez 3y ago
  ClippyAI
klft 3y ago
ChatGPT NT
fluidcruft 3y ago
ClipGPT
adrianmonk 3y ago
Dot Neural Net

prepend 3y ago

“Microsoft Chat 365” Although it would be beautiful if they name it Clippy and finally make Clippy into the all-powerful AGI it was destined to be.

kylebenzle 3y ago
At least in this forum can we please stop calling something that is not even close to AGI, AGI. Its just dumb at this point. We are LIGHT-YEARS away from AGI, even calling an LLM "AI" only makes sense for a lay audience. For developers and anyone in the know LLMs are called machine learning.
- prepend 3y ago
  I’m taking about the ultimate end product that Microsoft and OpenAI want to create. So I mean proper AGI. Naming the product Clippy now is perfectly fine while it’s just an LLM and will be more excellent over the years when it eventually achieves AGI ness. At least in this forum can we please stop misinterpreting things in a limited way to make pedantic points about how LLMs aren’t AGI (which I assume 98% of people here know). So I think it’s funny you assume I think chatgpt is an AGI.
  - JohnFen 3y ago
    I think that the dispute is about whether or not AGI is possible (at least withing the next several decades). One camp seems to be operating with the assumption that not only is it possible, but it's imminent. The other camp is saying that they've seen little reason to think that it is. (I'm in the latter camp).
    - prepend 3y ago
      I certainly think it’s possible but have no idea how close. Maybe it’s 50 years, maybe it’s next year. Either way, I think GGP’s comment was not applicable based on my comment as written and certainly my intent.
    - 3y ago

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

trhway 3y ago

>They could make ChatGPT++ Yes, though end result would probably be more like IE - barely good enough, forcefully pushed into everything and everywhere and squashing better competitors like IE squashed Netscape. When OpenAI went in with MSFT it was like they have ignored the 40 years of history of what MSFT has been doing to smaller technology partners. What happened to OpenAI pretty much fits that pattern of a smaller company who developed great tech and was raided by MSFT for that tech (the specific actions of specific persons aren't really important - the main factor is MSFT's gravitational force of a black hole, and it was just a matter of time before its destructive power manifests itself like in this case where it just tore apart the OpenAI with tidal forces)