2 ms·
> While undermining its safety argument Which is just political marketing for regulatory barriers to entry lobbying.
by liotier 3y ago
> While undermining its safety argument
Which is just political marketing for regulatory barriers to entry lobbying.
- bootsmann 3y agoIt was the legit raison d'être of the company when it was founded, the safetyism fiesta predates the legislative entrenchment.
- JumpCrisscross 3y agoI tend to agree. But we just watched folks vaporise tens of billions of dollars to defend that view. In light of that, I’m willing to give it a little credence.
- nullc 3y agoThere are multiple factions hiding behind safety. The regulatory capture faction and the BuildingGodInOurImage factions both currently say similar things to the public, but the underlying motivations are very different. But neither seem likely to want to open anything meaningful that is is AGI related-- locking the public out of powerful AI is a point in which all the major 'safety' factions are aligned. (well not the monopolization concern faction, but they're not a player here and usually don't hide behind the safety banner)