3 ms·
It's interesting for sure, but won't it mostly just be used for administrative tasks, like writing emails and summarizing documents? I can't think of anything d
by wavemode 3y ago
It's interesting for sure, but won't it mostly just be used for administrative tasks, like writing emails and summarizing documents? I can't think of anything directly relevant to warfare that LLM's would be well-suited for (spreading misinformation, maybe...)
- SushiHippie 3y agohttps://www.palantir.com/platforms/aip/ https://www.palantir.com/platforms/aip/
- freedomben 3y agoThere's plenty of things it could do with a little training. Cyberwarfare being one of the most potent I can think of. Even just used as a planning partner for everything from skirmishes to strategic initiatives, it could be helpful.
- fbdab103 3y agoWhile I suspect there are already many procedures in place for automatically flagging wrongthink, I could see LLMs being tuned to first pass intelligence sifting/summarization.
- TrapLord_Rhodo 3y agoThey've been doing this for years. This can be done using semantic search which has been around since the dawn of AI. Using LLM's for this is just overkill and way too expensive.
- warner25 3y agoJust administrative tasks? Administrative tasks are what most of the people in the DoD do all day.
- bee_rider 3y agoIf they are talking about the administrative bits of the DoD, there’s no real reason to single out defense. The whole government is a big administrative organization after all. I think the original thought must have been about intelligence analysis or weapons or something like that.
- croes 3y agoPsyOps is a big part of warfare.