> In hindsight firing Sam was a self-destructing gamble by the OpenAI board surely the really self-destructive gamble was hiring him? he's a venture capitalis

> In hindsight firing Sam was a self-destructing gamble by the OpenAI board surely the really self-destructive gamble was hiring him? he's a venture capitalist with weird beliefs about AI and privacy, why would it be a good idea to put him in charge of a notional non-profit that was trying to safely advance the start of the art in artificial intelligence?