3 ms·
First, there is no such thing as "galactic RAM". Second, there are three images of the same graph, each showing how access times aren't linear when they cross
by CyberDildonics 3y ago
First, there is no such thing as "galactic RAM".
Second, there are three images of the same graph, each showing how access times aren't linear when they cross cache boundaries. There aren't any transforms and there aren't any aggregate transforms f -> f’.
Third, algorithmic complexity is about abstract amounts of work relative to amount of elements. It isn't about "a series of sub-systems" or "galactic RAM".
This article shouldn't use big O notation because it isn't really about algorithms, it is just about non constant access times.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- 38321003thrw 3y ago> First, there is no such thing as “galactic RAM” And there goes my plans for floating a “secondary system wrapper” around openGRAM’s apis and VCing my way to the top of the unicorn charts. Oh well. “This is why I come to hn”.