4 ms·
> art galleries displaying things like empty canvases or toilet bowls This is so far from the norm and feels like a television lens version of artists and art
by lancesells 3y ago
> art galleries displaying things like empty canvases or toilet bowls
This is so far from the norm and feels like a television lens version of artists and art galleries. Yes, Duchamp used a toilet bowl in 1917 as art which was over 100 year ago. This is known because no one had done it before and presented an everyday object as art. This is 106 years old but still referred to so you can guess it was a big deal.
My suggestion is to visit a modern art museum in a larger city and you'll see this kind of "easy bullshit art as a statement" doesn't really exist.
https://www.tate.org.uk https://www.tate.org.uk
https://www.hauserwirth.com https://www.hauserwirth.com
https://www.moma.org https://www.moma.org
https://www.davidzwirner.com https://www.davidzwirner.com
https://gagosian.com https://gagosian.com
- vonjuice 3y agoI have visited modern art museums. I have seen similar "low effort" pieces among a wide catalogue of high effort ones. It is evident that real artists are very prolific and are not lazy or anything like that, that was not implying that, I don't even think of it as bullshit. My example was more about how the appearance of effort is not necessary for the viewer. Many people can look at abstract paintings and say "this is bullshit, my kid could do that!", and yet many people can also look at it and recognize beauty, and it's not because the latter group sees the piece as more effort, they're just able to parse the language of the piece better (imo).