3 ms·

Starting to think this was all some media stunt where they let ChatGPT make boardroom decisions for a day or two.

sebzim4500 3y ago
The RLHF models would never suggest this. The proposed solution is always to hold hands and sing Kumbaya. Maybe raw GPT-4 wants to fire everyone.
herval 3y ago
the AGI firing its boss as the first action would be :chefskiss:
badcppdev 3y ago
Maybe they just wanted to generate more material for the movie ?
- beretguy 3y ago
  > I have to make THE MOVIE! - Ross Scott
- wand3r 3y ago
  My favorite take from another HN comment, sadly I didnt save the UN for attribution: > Since this whole saga is so unbelievable: what if... board member Tasha McCauley's husband Joseph Gordon-Levitt orchestrated the whole board coup behind the scenes so he could direct and/or star in the Hollywood adaptation?
  - ruune 3y ago
    Wasn't convinced I'd watch a movie about it, but with Joseph Gordon-Levitt I'm in!
ben_w 3y ago
Four hours ago, I wrote on a telegram channel: My gut is leaning towards gpt-5 being, in at least one sense, too capable. Either that or someone cloned sama's voice and used an LLM to personally insult half the board.
starbugs 3y ago
Honestly, since a couple of days I have the feeling that nearly half of HN submissions are about this soap opera. Can't they send DMs? Why the need to make everything public via Twitter? It's quite paradox that of all things those people who build leading ML/AI systems are obviously the most rooted in egoism and emotions without an apparent glimpse of rationality.
- mrguyorama 3y ago
  The kind of people that are born on third base and think they hit a triple are at the top of basically every american institution right now. Of course they think the world is a better place if they share every stupid little thought that enters their brain because they are "special" and "super smart". The AI field especially has always been grifters. They have promised AGI with every method including the ones that we don't even remember. This is not a paradox.
  - ruune 3y ago
    Also don't forget the Open part in the name that they seemingly dropped as soon as there was actual money to be made, giving reasons why they couldn't open source GPT3 which they themselves threw under the bus by later releasing ChatGPT
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
ozgung 3y ago
Or maybe they created an evil-AGI-GPT by mistake, and now they have to act randomly and in the most unexpected ways to confuse evil-AGI-GPT’s predictive powers.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

The RLHF models would never suggest this. The proposed solution is always to hold hands and sing Kumbaya. Maybe raw GPT-4 wants to fire everyone.

herval 3y ago

the AGI firing its boss as the first action would be :chefskiss:

badcppdev 3y ago

Maybe they just wanted to generate more material for the movie ?

beretguy 3y ago
> I have to make THE MOVIE! - Ross Scott
wand3r 3y ago
My favorite take from another HN comment, sadly I didnt save the UN for attribution: > Since this whole saga is so unbelievable: what if... board member Tasha McCauley's husband Joseph Gordon-Levitt orchestrated the whole board coup behind the scenes so he could direct and/or star in the Hollywood adaptation?
- ruune 3y ago
  Wasn't convinced I'd watch a movie about it, but with Joseph Gordon-Levitt I'm in!

ben_w 3y ago

Four hours ago, I wrote on a telegram channel: My gut is leaning towards gpt-5 being, in at least one sense, too capable. Either that or someone cloned sama's voice and used an LLM to personally insult half the board.

starbugs 3y ago

Honestly, since a couple of days I have the feeling that nearly half of HN submissions are about this soap opera. Can't they send DMs? Why the need to make everything public via Twitter? It's quite paradox that of all things those people who build leading ML/AI systems are obviously the most rooted in egoism and emotions without an apparent glimpse of rationality.

mrguyorama 3y ago
The kind of people that are born on third base and think they hit a triple are at the top of basically every american institution right now. Of course they think the world is a better place if they share every stupid little thought that enters their brain because they are "special" and "super smart". The AI field especially has always been grifters. They have promised AGI with every method including the ones that we don't even remember. This is not a paradox.
- ruune 3y ago
  Also don't forget the Open part in the name that they seemingly dropped as soon as there was actual money to be made, giving reasons why they couldn't open source GPT3 which they themselves threw under the bus by later releasing ChatGPT
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

ozgung 3y ago

Or maybe they created an evil-AGI-GPT by mistake, and now they have to act randomly and in the most unexpected ways to confuse evil-AGI-GPT’s predictive powers.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]