4 ms·
You think they let inexperienced developers touch the YT code base without proper code review? Even if that were the case, which is an extremely charitable assu
by vanderZwan 3y ago
You think they let inexperienced developers touch the YT code base without proper code review? Even if that were the case, which is an extremely charitable assumption, that itself would be malice in my opinion.
- londons_explore 3y agolol This reply is for everyone who has ever worked on the codebase...
- ozim 3y agoShould be: LOL LGTM
- sapiogram 3y ago> You think they let inexperienced developers touch the YT code base without proper code review? Yes
- ric2b 3y agoYouTube is way too stable for that to be the case.
- enlyth 3y ago> You think they let inexperienced developers touch the YT code base Uh, yes? We were all inexperienced at some point. Just the linked file is like 300k lines of unminified code, I doubt it's all written by PHDs with 20 years of experience
- xxs 3y agoSome would argue that owning a PhD degree does not necessarily guarantee half decent engineering skills.
- vanderZwan 3y agoIt's the "without proper code review" part that I consider malice, not being inexperienced.