4 ms·
I think the most aggressive part of this is the "together with colleagues" sub sentence. He is basically openly poaching the employees of a company that he supp
by DalasNoin 3y ago
I think the most aggressive part of this is the "together with colleagues" sub sentence. He is basically openly poaching the employees of a company that he supposedly has a very close cooperation with. This situation seems especially difficult since Microsoft basically houses all of openai's infrastructure. How can they continue a trust-based relationship like this?
- cinntaile 3y agoRegarding the trust-based relationship... OpenAI burned that bridge and Microsoft was made aware of the very real threat that OpenAI is not in line with them, they'll try to get out as fast as humanly possible.
- loceng 3y agoIf the claim that Sam Altman wasn't consistently [over long period of time] "candid" with the board, e.g. they're saying he's been lying to them - is it OpenAI that burned that bridge who has a responsibility to act on real information, or Sam Altman that is in fact the responsible party - even if he ends up "winning" out in the consequences?