3 ms·
There is a third option where he stayed, they managed to find a compromise, and in so doing kept their influence in the space to a large extent.
by abm53 3y ago
There is a third option where he stayed, they managed to find a compromise, and in so doing kept their influence in the space to a large extent.
- layer8 3y agoI'm pretty sure they tried that before firing him.
- s3p 3y agoSeeing as the vote took place in a haphazard way on the 11th hour during a weekend, I’m not sure they did.
- layer8 3y agoThe vote for firing him effectively took place on Thursday at the latest, given that Murati was informed about it that evening.
- ethanbond 3y agoThis has been a source of tension at least since the release of ChatGPT, so… yeah it’s not like the problem came out of nowhere. The governance structure itself is indicative of quite elaborate attempts to reconcile it.
- mbreese 3y agoI don’t know about that. Yes, there was tension built into the structure, something happened to trigger this. You don’t fire your CEO without a backup plan if this was an on going conflict. And if your backup plan is to keep the current president (who was the chair of the board until you removed him), that’s not a backup plan. Everything points to this being a haphazard change that’s clumsy at best.
- ethanbond 3y agoThe question was “did they try to find compromise” not “was the firing haphazard.” The answer is definitely yes to the former.
- cyanydeez 3y agoyou can interpret it exactly opposite: they tried to negotiate and he lied .
- bart_spoon 3y agoYou are assuming there was absolutely no build up to the firing. Just because the disagreements weren’t public doesn’t mean they weren’t happening.