3 ms·
Related: discussion[0] of the article[1] mentioned here comparing C64/6502 and IBM PC/8088 performance. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38345672 https
by qwery 3y ago
Related: discussion[0] of the article[1] mentioned here comparing C64/6502 and IBM PC/8088 performance.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38345672 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38345672
[1] https://trixter.oldskool.org/2011/06/04/at-a-disadvantage/ https://trixter.oldskool.org/2011/06/04/at-a-disadvantage/
- flohofwoe 3y agoI think there's an error in [1] though. On the 6502 the minimal instruction cycle count is two clock cycles, not one. It's correct though that a 6502 can do (and indeed always does) a memory access in each clock cycle, most of those are redundant "junk reads" though.