3 ms·
It was a negotiation. Did they have power... Ofc they did. Otherwise... Why were they negotiating? Its not about who had more power. They just couldn't find e
by nopromisessir 3y ago
It was a negotiation.
Did they have power... Ofc they did. Otherwise... Why were they negotiating?
Its not about who had more power. They just couldn't find enough common ground.
Now Satya bagged talent. They don't have to rewrite the whole codebase due to IP msft has already secured.
I think those talks were real. You don't build something that long and then want to walk away unless huge differences came up. That's what we say.
(edit: rewritten after the comment I responded to added a game changing comment at the top)
PR? I mean... That's just not how I would describe what happened.
It was a PR nightmare. They tried to keep the family together. Divorces happen. Satya brought the kids on so they can get a new sandbox going asap.
Don't believe Twitter? Now there...we agree. I'll add... Don't belive hackernews either.
Most of the reporting I saw was pretty good. It just didn't pan out. They reported the board was optimistic. Not that it was a sure thing.
(edit: full comment rewrite due to edit by the commentor which completely changed the context)
- peanuty1 3y agoWill be interesting to see how many OpenAI employees leave OpenAI to work at Microsoft.
- bottlepalm 3y agoRSUs have got to be better than PPUs.
- _mh56 3y agoI agree with you. Satya (msft CEO) has stated that sam is joining msft. The comment was a general overtone of the discussions happening online. >> Now satya stayed up till 2am to secure up to 40 percent of open talent exodus Are there any official sources for this?
- nopromisessir 3y agoHis tweet timing. I don't think his secretary does it for him. Doesnt seem like his style.
- loveparade 3y ago"Talent secured"