2 ms·
Read the paper linked above, and if you don't agree that's okay. There are many who don't.
by ignoramous 3y ago
Read the paper linked above, and if you don't agree that's okay. There are many who don't.
- maxlin 3y agoCheck it again, I think you might have misread the thing. It categorizes things in a way that clearly separates AlphaGO from even shooting towards "AGI". The "General" part of AGI can't really be skipped or words don't make any sense anymore.
- ignoramous 3y agoAh, gotcha; I meant "superintelligence" (which is ASI and not AGI).
- calf 3y agoHas anyone written a response to this paper? Their main gist is to try to define AGI empirically using only what is measurable.