6 ms·

So the board fired the CEO and appointed a new one. The new CEO now wants to hire the old CEO back but now the board doesn’t want either of them to be CEO and i

by JCM9 3y ago

So the board fired the CEO and appointed a new one. The new CEO now wants to hire the old CEO back but now the board doesn’t want either of them to be CEO and is trying to find a totally new CEO. What a friggin’ mess.

nicce 3y ago
She is interim CEO, meaning that her job is to hire new CEO. And she is not hiring the old CEO into CEO role. Edit: Not to choose the CEO but do the practical things
- acyou 3y ago
  To the contrary, I would prefer to interpret the article's wording as saying she's working on rehiring Sam and Greg into their old positions, presumably directly against the board's wishes.
  - nicce 3y ago
    From the article: > in a capacity that has yet to be finalized Very hard to say.
- adastra22 3y ago
  No it is the board’s job to hire the new ceo. The interim ceo is supposed to run the company.
- nostrademons 3y ago
  It's the board's job to hire the new CEO. The interim CEO runs the company until a permanent CEO is found. The interim CEO can hire people below her (advisers, other C-suite execs) but has no authority to hire the permanent CEO.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
junofan 3y ago
Complete clown show by Ilya, Helen, Adam, and Tasha.
- EMIRELADERO 3y ago
  How would you have done it?
  - junofan 3y ago
    Done what? A competent board would not do this.
    - EMIRELADERO 3y ago
      Suppose there's an unfixable conflict of interest/vision between Altman and the board, what would you have done if you were in the board's shoes?
  - colmvp 3y ago
    To be frank, isn't it weird to appoint an interim CEO who sides with the person you ousted? Why not have appointed someone more sympathetic to your position?
- whoknowsidont 3y ago
  [flagged]
  - adastra22 3y ago
    So remove Ilya, got it.
    - whoknowsidont 3y ago
      Can you expound on what you mean?
      - 3y ago
merelysounds 3y ago
> The new CEO now wants to hire the old CEO back The article says “in a capacity that has yet to be finalized” - so this might be not as significant. > but now the board doesn’t want either of them to be CEO and is trying to find a totally new CEO That part is not unexpected - they announced an interim CEO after all. Additionally there are no sources and the article is based on hearsay. For all we know this might be clickbait.

by JCM9 3y ago

nicce 3y ago

She is interim CEO, meaning that her job is to hire new CEO. And she is not hiring the old CEO into CEO role. Edit: Not to choose the CEO but do the practical things

acyou 3y ago
To the contrary, I would prefer to interpret the article's wording as saying she's working on rehiring Sam and Greg into their old positions, presumably directly against the board's wishes.
- nicce 3y ago
  From the article: > in a capacity that has yet to be finalized Very hard to say.
adastra22 3y ago
No it is the board’s job to hire the new ceo. The interim ceo is supposed to run the company.
nostrademons 3y ago
It's the board's job to hire the new CEO. The interim CEO runs the company until a permanent CEO is found. The interim CEO can hire people below her (advisers, other C-suite execs) but has no authority to hire the permanent CEO.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]

junofan 3y ago

Complete clown show by Ilya, Helen, Adam, and Tasha.

EMIRELADERO 3y ago
How would you have done it?
- junofan 3y ago
  Done what? A competent board would not do this.
  - EMIRELADERO 3y ago
    Suppose there's an unfixable conflict of interest/vision between Altman and the board, what would you have done if you were in the board's shoes?
- colmvp 3y ago
  To be frank, isn't it weird to appoint an interim CEO who sides with the person you ousted? Why not have appointed someone more sympathetic to your position?
whoknowsidont 3y ago
[flagged]
- adastra22 3y ago
  So remove Ilya, got it.
  - whoknowsidont 3y ago
    Can you expound on what you mean?
    - 3y ago

merelysounds 3y ago

> The new CEO now wants to hire the old CEO back The article says “in a capacity that has yet to be finalized” - so this might be not as significant. > but now the board doesn’t want either of them to be CEO and is trying to find a totally new CEO That part is not unexpected - they announced an interim CEO after all. Additionally there are no sources and the article is based on hearsay. For all we know this might be clickbait.