> All we have to do for any of these is… implement them. An idea isn't a solution. I don't know what you are even talking about. Until we are actually solving

> All we have to do for any of these is… implement them. An idea isn't a solution. I don't know what you are even talking about. Until we are actually solving these problems in a substantial way we have nothing but hope, we don't know that anything will pan out. > Can too. There is no 100% automated lab. Tools being controlled by a computer doesn't mean they are loaded, prepared and most importantly maintained by humans. And Science requires different types of labs, I just watched a documentary about the making of the new Malaria vaccine, and how challenging it was to produce the ~cup of vaccine needed for clinical trials vs producing enough for validation was fascinating. > Irrelevant no it's not. We are so far from 100% automation of anything. Some human being has to install and maintain literally everything in every factory. Nobody is making self maintaining bots, much less ones that can do everything. > So incredibly and wildly false Comparing human seamstresses to even the latest crop of Robotic fabric handlers(that haven't seen mass market penetration best I can tell, so are still unproven in my book) is like comparing OSMO to a construction worker. It's not false. That video, which I watched with interest, is not convincing at all, having seen more traditional jeans making places. > Most of the problems with manufacturing these days are specifically the human part of it. Because the human part is by far the hardest. > do actually follow that link I gave you before https://github.com/GT-RIPL/Awesome-LLM-Robotics https://github.com/GT-RIPL/Awesome-LLM-Robotics Ok and? nice Gish Gallop I guess?