2 ms·
If there's one Big Lie in the AI field, it's the idea that the models just "learn things" as if we invented magic that eats raw text and images and poops out in
by kmeisthax 3y ago
If there's one Big Lie in the AI field, it's the idea that the models just "learn things" as if we invented magic that eats raw text and images and poops out intelligence. Not nearly enough attention is paid to the labeling and filtering infrastructure used to produce the datasets, a lot of which is human labor or derivatives thereof[0].
The fact that this labor is being offloaded to third-world kids who know how to steal their parents ID to earn beer money^W^W0.69 bobux is also a scandal, but it's the boring, frustratingly mundane kind that is common to all "gig economy" companies. Surely, not every kid is being permanently damaged by this exploitation, and there's certainly worse exploitation out there, but it's still exploitation. And these AI models aren't AI, they're products of lots of human labeling and filtering.
[0] e.g. reward modeling
- fnordpiglet 3y agoI don’t get your point that it’s not AI. Just because the input to the model is curated doesn’t make it either not intelligent or not artificial. Its properties are what they are regardless of the genesis. Assuming the behavior they display is intelligence, I assume also we agree it’s artificial and not naturally emergent. Am I missing something?
- jrpt 3y agoIt’s not a really a “big lie” when they are upfront about RLHF. The H stands for human.