I understand this is an ironic retort, but the actual standard is even worse than "guilty until proven innocent", it is "arbitrary rule of whatever is convenien

I understand this is an ironic retort, but the actual standard is even worse than "guilty until proven innocent", it is "arbitrary rule of whatever is convenient to Google's interests". This is the danger of relying on a centralized corporate entity to gatekeep a public resource like the public internet. It is extrajudicial. And it is a gigantic power for one entity to hold without any oversight.