4 ms·
These are not "ways" of achieving superhuman intelligence, these are potential forms of superhuman performance. It's also a very broad definition, because by t
by greenthrow 3y ago
These are not "ways" of achieving superhuman intelligence, these are potential forms of superhuman performance.
It's also a very broad definition, because by that definition we have had superhuman performance in computation for decades. And we've been able to write programs for very narrow tasks that outperform humans for that time as well.
Generally when people are comparing artificial intelligence against human intelligence, they want an AGI. Humans aren't good at just one narrow thing, that's why they aren't all replaced by specialized programs already. We are taking about being able to describe a problem and the artificial intelligence can take it from there. That's why the bar is AGI, which is a much higher bar than any of your broad definitions.
- pixl97 3y agoThough I think we should take note that the write programs for very narrow tasks that outperform humans may start seeing widening. Things like object recognition have moved from "only humans can do this" to machines are keeping up with us. And I think that this is how it will be for at least some time. Instead of one big blast where ASI is better than humans at everything, more and more categories of narrow intelligence will widen and become superhuman.