2 ms·
It's only important that humans (or "humans") were about 90% correct. Whereas GPT-4 was only 33% correct. If those turks were using AI, that would mean there is
by Gare 3y ago
It's only important that humans (or "humans") were about 90% correct. Whereas GPT-4 was only 33% correct. If those turks were using AI, that would mean there is AI out there much more capable than GPT-4.
- avs733 3y agoIt doesn’t… The problem is that unless the data are credible and reliable, any interpretation of that data is meaningless. For or against one’s hypotheses doesn’t matter if the data is junk. If the data is junk you can’t move past that, it’s the end of the conversation because the data has no meaning.