3 ms·
You can (and most likely should) still use a OSI-approved license if you want, such as AGPL/GPLv3, while providing the possibility of case-to-case commercial li
by KolmogorovComp 3y ago
You can (and most likely should) still use a OSI-approved license if you want, such as AGPL/GPLv3, while providing the possibility of case-to-case commercial licenses.
gifski [0] for example is a successful open-source project doing that.
[0] https://gif.ski/license.html https://gif.ski/license.html
- BrianHenryIE 3y agoI just see now, there are two Gifskis, one Rust, one Swift. It's worth looking at the maintainer of the Swift one, he has 1000+ repos, many with 1000+ stars. * https://github.com/ImageOptim/gifski https://github.com/ImageOptim/gifski * https://github.com/sindresorhus/Gifski https://github.com/sindresorhus/Gifski * https://github.com/sindresorhus https://github.com/sindresorhus
- nativeit 3y agoHe appears to be the original creator of the “Awesome X” repo: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome
- KolmogorovComp 3y agoBoth gifski are maintained by @sindresorhus, as you can see by commit counts. (Even if he’s not the main maintainer of the swift version).