The conclusion of "GPT-4 can't even compete against low-quality human effort like that found on MTurk" seems alright. The article would be better if it didn't c

The conclusion of "GPT-4 can't even compete against low-quality human effort like that found on MTurk" seems alright. The article would be better if it didn't claim to compare "humans", because it doesn't – or at least, not in the common sense definition of "comparing humans vs GPT-4". But to be honest I think that's a bit pedantic. It would be different if it had found that GPT-4 outperformed MTurk, but if GPT-4 can't compete against MTurk on these tasks, then I don't think it will fare better against you or me with our full attention.