3 ms·
Absolutely correct! But it still seems to me that Taibbi is focussing on one particular aspect of it without any indication that he noticed the other angle.
by cstross 15y ago
Absolutely correct!
But it still seems to me that Taibbi is focussing on one particular aspect of it without any indication that he noticed the other angle.
- Avshalom 15y agoTaibbi focused on the aspect of the JOBS act because the angle you propose is already legal and the advertised angle (kickstarter for IPOs) is (as far as he and others are concerned) just a veneer used to sell it to the rubes.