4 ms·

How is it different than knockout? It looks very similar from what I can tell.

• weepy 15y ago
  It certainly shares some features such as data-bind. But it's much smaller and simpler. It's also general purpose rather than the Root style for Knockout. Additionally it uses jQuery to deliver most of the bindings which makes it one less thing to learn.
  • ishi 15y ago
    It does look useful, but that's a weird choice for a name...
    • weepy 15y ago
      o_O
    • weepy 15y ago
      if you don't like the name you can import to another namespace : <script src="../o_O.js?mynamespace"></script>
  • weepy 15y ago
    check out how long each of the pages are: http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.js http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.js vs http://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/knockout-2.1.0beta.debug.js http://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/kn... !
• chc 15y ago
  It looks like the primary difference is that Knockout has a no-dependency philosophy while this library is explicitly designed to be used with other libraries.
  • weepy 15y ago
    Correct - it's more the toolset philosophy of Backbone rather than Ember or Knockout which are more frameworks. Up to you which philosophy you prefer.