The article rehashes some well-known arguments, but the most interesting part of it for me was this: > “People need to be in the office to be a part of the TEA

The article rehashes some well-known arguments, but the most interesting part of it for me was this: > “People need to be in the office to be a part of the TEAM” > This gets at a much deeper issue, however. Should we be loyal to companies who would lay us off at the drop of a hat to pad their quarterly earnings? Companies who decide the projects we work on have no merit but can’t be bothered to reassign us to more critical work after spending the time and money to get us in the door? Many of us feel the need to be loyal but what are we getting in return? The author acknowledges that team-building may be easier in the office, but the question is whether team-building is of any benefit other than to keep employees stuck to their employer.