3 ms·
> I think that's a bad analogy because I actually use ABS and TC. I don't really use an enum heavy style of programming. The point the others are making is you
by ParetoOptimal 3y ago
> I think that's a bad analogy because I actually use ABS and TC. I don't really use an enum heavy style of programming.
The point the others are making is you are using a less safe type of programming equivalent to driving without ABS and TC.
From your point of view, "TC and ABS is useful so I use it unlike enums".
From their point of view though, you are the person not using ABS and TC insisting that they offer nothing useful.
- Kamq 3y agoTo continue the analogy, since I don't use enums, I'm also the person who isn't driving the car. Can you explain how owning a car without ABS and not driving it is less safe? Edit: Wait, or am I not using breaks? I think the analogy changed slightly during this whole process.
- ParetoOptimal 3y ago> Can you explain how owning a car without ABS and not driving it is less safe? I don't know that it is, I'm speaking based on the implication in this thread that no-enum and no-ABS people are overconfident to a fault. I do believe that those who claim they don't need enums, static typing, etc are probably overconfident and have a strong desire or need to feel more control. I'm not sure though, at least for GC'd languages, how enums sacrifice control.