3 ms·

The board can easily back up their public claim. They don't. Even the email to their own employees says it is a irreconcilable difference. Nothing about lying.

The board can easily back up their public claim. They don't. Even the email to their own employees says it is a irreconcilable difference. Nothing about lying. I don't think it is reasonable to go with "we don't know". It is more like: "it is crucial to back up your claim. Still, you don't.".

Keyframe 3y ago
I don't disagree. It's just maybe they have something they haven't shared or maybe they don't. We don't know (yet).
- ergocoder 3y ago
  The fact that they didn't follow up with evidence immediately shows that they are incompetent. You don't just accuse someone of committing a heinous crime and stay silent. What is the detail?
  - Keyframe 3y ago
    True, but are they obliged to provide all details to the public?
    - ergocoder 3y ago
      No, but they are also not obliged to accuse Sam of lying either. But here we are. You think accusing someone of lying in a public statement and don't follow up is competent?
      - Keyframe 3y ago
        I agree with you