4 ms·
Is o_O the best HTML binding library out there?
http://weepy.github.com/o_O
- weepy 14y agoHere's two links to the example pages http://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/guide/index.html http://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/guide/index.html http://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/todos/index.html http://weepy.github.com/o_O/examples/todos/index.html
- ishi 14y agoHow is it different than knockout? It looks very similar from what I can tell.
- weepy 14y agoIt certainly shares some features such as data-bind. But it's much smaller and simpler. It's also general purpose rather than the Root style for Knockout. Additionally it uses jQuery to deliver most of the bindings which makes it one less thing to learn.
- ishi 14y agoIt does look useful, but that's a weird choice for a name...
- weepy 14y agocheck out how long each of the pages are: http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.js http://weepy.github.com/o_O/o_O.js vs http://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/knockout-2.1.0beta.debug.js http://cloud.github.com/downloads/SteveSanderson/knockout/kn... !
- chc 14y agoIt looks like the primary difference is that Knockout has a no-dependency philosophy while this library is explicitly designed to be used with other libraries.
- weepy 14y agoCorrect - it's more the toolset philosophy of Backbone rather than Ember or Knockout which are more frameworks. Up to you which philosophy you prefer.