> FTL I wrote explicitly about a subluminal warp-drive at 1/100 percent of light speed. There is no hint in my text of alternative theories. On contrary I cite

> FTL I wrote explicitly about a subluminal warp-drive at 1/100 percent of light speed. There is no hint in my text of alternative theories. On contrary I cite Bobrick and Gianni Martire: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e There was a continuous string of serious publications since Alcubierre's work. There is no need that this warpdrive accommodate living beings, it could be a nanoprobe. What's important is to start somewhere. At some time engineers must enter the arena and discuss how to make a real warpdrive.