3 ms·
You are speaking from a position where the Moon landing is a proven, undisputed fact verified by everyone. In order for it to be that, it needs to be done again
by wheelerof4te 3y ago
You are speaking from a position where the Moon landing is a proven, undisputed fact verified by everyone. In order for it to be that, it needs to be done again. Speaking plainly, it needs to be repeated in a reasonable enough timeframe, just like every other experiment done in history, in order for it to become a scientific fact.
Instead of admitting that logical conclusion, you are pulling a strawman on me. Our discussion is over.
- michaelmrose 3y agoHistorical events are by definition not repeatable and facts don't need to be repeated. For instance we don't need to repeat WWII for it to have happened. It is sufficient to examine the historical record. The fact that you don't understand the difference between scientific fact and historical fact makes it hard communicate with you. You yourself mentioned an experiment that can be repeated, bouncing light off those reflectors, its been done we went to the moon. A better question than "Did we go to the moon?" would be why do you want to believe we didn't? Is it anti western propaganda that you've swallowed uncritically? What other conspiracy theories do you believe?
- wheelerof4te 3y ago"Is it anti western propaganda that you've swallowed uncritically?" No, just common sense after looking at the pictures from NASA's archive. And also, looking at all the hard evidence presented by this guy convinced me that there is ZERO chance any human ever went to the Moon: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/ https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/ As for the other "conspiracies", 9/11 being an inside job, and JFK being murdered for going after the FED and Isreali nuclear programme. Any other questions?