3 ms·
Seems like a pretty good idea. Why do you need to go over 100mph? Really no possible reason. Geo-located speed limits seem a bit iffy. Fine if they work correc
by extr 3y ago
Seems like a pretty good idea. Why do you need to go over 100mph? Really no possible reason.
Geo-located speed limits seem a bit iffy. Fine if they work correctly, but I can see it being pretty annoying if it isn't perfect. And it seems like a potentially complicated thing for the government to run well.
If you're opposed: just remember this would probably dramatically decrease your insurance costs, especially if you are a young male or have a teenage son.
- rufus_foreman 3y ago[flagged]
- Nursie 3y agoThat’s nobody then, because we have a lot of rules you can classify this way, and for the most part they are very widely supported. Do people in favour of food safety standards deserve neither liberty nor safety? What about my liberty to sell ‘meat’ tacos without government interference? It’s a very grey area in modern societies, you can’t really blanket-apply statements about freedom like that, to something that’s really an incremental change.
- rufus_foreman 3y agoFreedom is my god.
- cykros 3y agoYou just witnessed a significant crime. Someone's chasing you to mop up loose ends. It's a somewhat contrived case, but being chased happens. A car that automatically tickets you would be one where this would perhaps be the only reason you'd go this fast, but would still prevent a scenario in which your car potentially decides to turn you over to someone who would kill you. Not that I'd love seeing either option -- but I'm much more for leaving room for extenuating circumstances than I am for locking people out of functionality without due process.