3 ms·
What toxicity? This doesn't track for me. > backward compatibility won't be broken. I'm not sure what your point is anymore. You are clearly divested. Your as
by xyzzy_plugh 3y ago
What toxicity? This doesn't track for me.
> backward compatibility won't be broken.
I'm not sure what your point is anymore. You are clearly divested. Your assessment is totally unfounded. What are you trying to accomplish here?
- Seb-C 3y agoPersonal attacks are not welcome and against HN guidelines. You can disagree with me and criticize my points, but I do not feel like it's done in a good faith or is leading to anything constructive. So I'm going to stop the discussion here and let the readers judge by themselves what I meant, and what to conclude about it.
- xyzzy_plugh 3y agoI mean no ill intent, I genuinely have no idea what you're arguing towards. You repeatedly claim dogma and even toxicity (!) where I can find no evidence of either -- that certainly doesn't feel like good faith to me. It feels like FUD.