4 ms·
Don't you think Babs' lawyers told her the same thing till she was the poster girl for Google Maps? Oy vey, peopl3 (corporations) never learn Edit: in the spir
by Obscurity4340 3y ago
Don't you think Babs' lawyers told her the same thing till she was the poster girl for Google Maps? Oy vey, peopl3 (corporations) never learn
Edit: in the spirit of dialogue, can you describe exactly how paying a company to spy and manipulate you more with zero gurantees they won't ban you for nothing ever is smart? I just don't get the rationale here, how are you in any way better off paying (to say nothing of the relying aspect which is not discussed nearly enough) Google anything for anything? You're already literally the product in more ways than anyone could ever fathom at the baseline and then you hand them more money to be even more—product(ive)? I just don't get but I also maybe was a but invective and i apologize for that
- recursive 3y agoIt's a subscription. If they ban me, I'd stop paying. The rationale is that it suppresses ads. And is bundled with YT Music, which I actually like and use. I've heard the arguments about ad blockers, but none of those seem to work across all the devices and networks I use.
- Obscurity4340 3y agoI probably shouldnt be trying to talk you out of this. Please disregard, honestly there needs to be people on both sides for everything to maintain balance in all things. Like that funny catapult. If it works for you, works for me :) The world is my ecosystem Edit: trebuchet aha
- Obscurity4340 3y ago> not clever enough [anymore] Can you expand on that point? Its definitely provocative and moreso amusing but you've got me hooked now