4 ms·
> the compression algorithm should be improved There is an obvious third choice: the gain in compression isn't worth the effort of writing code to detect these
by avisser 3y ago
> the compression algorithm should be improved
There is an obvious third choice: the gain in compression isn't worth the effort of writing code to detect these non-discernible artifacts.
People are throwing around 0.2 bits/second in this thread. I doubt a company or individual would write code for such a trivial gain, never mind the slowdown in encoding it might cause.
- TerrifiedMouse 3y ago> isn't worth the effort of writing code to detect these non-discernible artifacts Why wouldn’t it be worth it? You just have to write the code once and it will affect terabytes of music being compressed from that point forth.
- avisser 3y agoBecause it's bad business. How much will people spend to save 0.2bps? My guess is $0. Why spend anything on technology with no return?