4 ms·
Yes. And that's completely fine. By the way, we know Einstein's theory of relatively is not quite right, there has been enormous amount of work since the early
by latency-guy2 3y ago
Yes. And that's completely fine. By the way, we know Einstein's theory of relatively is not quite right, there has been enormous amount of work since the early 1900s, its all good. Einstein's work was foundational, but incomplete, lets keep going.
- bigbillheck 3y ago> By the way, we know Einstein's theory of relatively is not quite right Do we? It's incompatible with the standard model, but that's not the same as "not quite right".
- latency-guy2 3y agoWe can argue semantics all day, "not quite right" is equivalent to "incomplete" to me, which I hope we are in agreement with.
- pdonis 3y ago> "not quite right" is equivalent to "incomplete" Not necessarily. "Not quite right" implies that GR makes wrong predictions for experiments that have already been done--which is wrong. "Incomplete" just means that GR might not cover some experiments that have not yet been done.
- ramraj07 3y agoWhat exactly isn’t right about “theory of relativity”? Like the general theory?
- latency-guy2 3y agoSee below, don't take it as me saying theory of relativity is fundamentally wrong.
- User23 3y agoWell the big thing is it contradicts quantum mechanics, which has far better experimental support.
- pdonis 3y agoQM only has experimental support for non-gravitational interactions. We have no experiments that show any quantum aspects of gravity itself.